Virtual Reality for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Healthcare Professionals Training: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual reality (VR) is becoming increasingly popular to train health-care professionals (HCPs) to acquire and/or maintain cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) basic or advanced skills. AIM: To understand whether VR in CPR training or retraining courses can have benefits for patients (neonatal, pediatric, and adult), HCPs and health-care organizations as compared to traditional CPR training. METHODS: A systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023431768) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In June 2023, the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched and included studies evaluated in their methodological quality with Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Data were narratively summarized. RESULTS: Fifteen studies published between 2013 and 2023 with overall fair quality were included. No studies investigated patients' outcomes. At the HCP level, the virtual learning environment was perceived to be engaging, realistic and facilitated the memorization of the procedures; however, limited decision-making, team building, psychological pressure and frenetic environment were underlined as disadvantages. Moreover, a general improvement in performance was reported in the use of the defibrillator and carrying out the chest compressions. At the organizational level, one study performed a cost/benefit evaluation in favor of VR as compared to traditional CPR training. CONCLUSIONS: The use of VR for CPR training and retraining is in an early stage of development. Some benefits at the HCP level are promising. However, more research is needed with standardized approaches to ensure a progressive accumulation of the evidence and inform decisions regarding the best training methodology in this field.

[The nurses' strike in the United Kingdom: the reasons, the debate and the implications]. / Lo sciopero degli infermieri nel Regno Unito: le ragioni, il dibattito e le implicazioni.

. The nurses' strike in the United Kingdom: an overview of the reasons, debate and implications. INTRODUCTION: In the UK, where the National Health Service (NHS) was founded, one of the most important and long-lasting strikes in nursing is taking place. AIM: To understand the historical, professional, political/social reasons for the UK nurse's strike. METHOD: Historical, scientific literature and data from key informant interviews have been analysed. Data has been summarized narratively. RESULTS: On 15th December 2022, more than 100,000 NHS nurses went on strike in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales asking for an increased salary; on the 6th and 7th of February and 1st of March the protest has continued. By improving pay, nurses believe the attractiveness of the profession can increase and counteract the loss of nurses who are leaving the public for the private sector, and the lack of attractiveness of the profession towards young people. The strike is organized by the Royal College of Nursing in a structured form which gives nurses precise information on how it should be explained to patients: according to a survey, 79% of the population supports the nurses' strike. However, not all agree with this strike action. DISCUSSION: The media, social media and professional debate is passionate with some polarization between who is in favor and who is against. Nurses strike not only for better wages but also to increase patient safety. What we see in the UK today is the result of years of austerity, lack of investment and health priorities: a similar situation experienced in several countries as well.

Emergency medical service treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Identification of weak links in the chain-of-survival through an epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: In-depth analysis of emergency medical services (EMSs) performances in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) promotes quality improvement. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to identify the improvable factors of the EMS response to OHCA through the description and analysis of OHCA incidence, characteristics, management and outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on all OHCA patients treated by the EMSs of the district of Trieste, Italy (236,556 inhabitants) in 2011. RESULTS: A total of 678 OHCAs occurred and 142 (20.1%) underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), with a respective incidence of 287/100,000/year and 60/100,000/year. The incidence of shockable rhythms in the CPR group was 13/100,000. OHCAs occurred mainly during daytime, though the proportion of patients receiving CPR was significantly higher by night-time (p=0.01). Thirty-four CPR patients (23.9%) restored spontaneous circulation on scene; 12 (8.5%) survived to hospital discharge (11 with good neurological recovery). Survival was not correlated with age, while was significantly higher for patients with shockable rhythms (32.3%; p<0.001). Mean response time was 8 min. Direct intervention of physician-staffed units did not improve the outcome when compared with two-tiered activation. Patients immediately identified as OHCA by dispatch nurses and those undergoing therapeutic hypothermia showed a non-significant trend towards improved survival (p=0.09 and 0.07, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OHCA identification by dispatch nurses and reduction of response time were the factors most susceptible to improvement.